Abstract. An overview of the handling of map projections in oce is presented, along with a few examples of common projections. Readers are cautioned that oce has difficulties with some projections, which can cause spurious horizontal lines (or poor landmass filling) on plots.
Map projections provide methods for representing the three-dimensional surface of the earth as two-dimensional plots. Although most oceanographers are likely to be familiar with the basic ideas of map projection, they may find it helpful to consult the wide literature on this topic, whether to learn about the details of individual projections and to get advice on the best choice of projection for a particular task. Snyder (1987), Snyder (1993) and Snyder and Voxland (1994) are all excellent sources on these topics, and the first and last of these are available for free online.
Oce handles map projections by calling the sf_project
function of the sf
R package, and so the notation for
representing the projection is borrowed from sf
. This
system will be familiar to many readers, because it is used in other R
packages, and more widely in the software called PROJ, which has
interfaces in python and other programming languages (PROJ contributors,
2020). Since oce uses inverse projections in some of its graphical work,
only PROJ projections that have inverses are incorporated into oce.
Furthermore, some projections are omitted from oce because they have
been witnessed to cause problems on the oce developer’s computers,
including infinite loops and core dumps. See the help for the oce
function mapPlot
for a list of the available projections,
and some advice on choosing them.
You must ensure that the sf
package is installed for the
examples provided in this vignette to work. If this package is not
installed, it may be installed with
There are far too many projections to illustrate here. See
https://dankelley.github.io/r/2015/04/03/oce-proj.html
for
a blog item that provides examples of the available projections. Note
that some have a problem with spurious horizontal lines. This can result
from coastline segments that cross the edge of the plotting area, and
getting rid of this is tricky enough to be the heart of the
longest-lived bug in the oce
issue list, i.e.
https://github.com/dankelley/oce/issues/388
. In some
instances the function coastlineCut()
can help, but it is
provisional and subject to change.
For map views that span only a few tens or hundreds of kilometers, it may be sufficient to plot directly, in rectilinear longitude-latitude space, but with an appropriate aspect ratio so that circular islands will appear circular in the plot.
To see the need for setting the aspect ratio, consider the following view of North America.
library(oce)
data(coastlineWorld)
lon <- coastlineWorld[["longitude"]]
lat <- coastlineWorld[["latitude"]]
par(mar = c(4, 4, 0.5, 0.5))
plot(lon, lat,
type = "l",
xlim = c(-130, -50), ylim = c(40, 50)
)
Readers familiar with this region will notice that the coastline
shapes are distorted. The solution to this problem is to set the
asp
argument of plot()
to a value appropriate
to the general latitude of the view (45N, in this case).
par(mar = c(4, 4, 0.5, 0.5))
plot(lon, lat,
type = "l",
xlim = c(-130, -50), ylim = c(40, 50), asp = 1 / cos(45 * pi / 180)
)
Although the above approach is not exactly taxing, the effort of
setting the aspect ratio and setting line-type plots can be spared by
using the generic plot()
function for
coastline
objects, as follows.
Note that this plot
is being transferred to the
specialized method for a coastline
object (defined by the
oce
package) and that this means that there are some
arguments in addition to those of the normal plot
function.
In this example, the second and third arguments specify the central spot
of interest, and the fourth is a suggested diagonal span, in kilometres.
(The span is not always obeyed exactly, and the results also depend on
aspect ratio of the plot device.)
The graphs shown above share a common strength: the axes for longitude and latitude are orthogonal, and the scale along each axis is linear. This makes it easy for readers to identify the location of features of the diagrams. However, using linear axes on large-scale views leads to distortions of coastline shapes and relative feature sizes, and motivates the use of map projections. (Readers who question the previous sentence are again encouraged to consult some of the references in the bibliography.)
It makes sense to switch to a coarser coastline file for the examples to follow, because plotting a detailed coastline in a world view leads to a scribbling effect that obscures the large-scale coastline shapes.
The function used to produce maps with projections is
mapPlot
, and with default arguments it produces
Note that the land is coloured in this example, but that sometimes doing that will yield odd-looking plots, because of a bug in how some projections are handled in oce.
This default plot uses the Mollweide projection (see any of the
Snyder references in the bibliography), which is set by the default
value "+proj=moll"
for mapPlot
. Another
popular world view is the Robinson projection, which has been used by
Rand McNally, the National Geographic Society, and other groups.
Exercise 1. Plot the world with a Robinson projection, using gray shading for land.
Exercise 2. Plot an image of world topography with the Mollweide projection.
In both these views (and in most world-spanning projections) there is substantial distortion at high latitudes. The Stereographic projection offers a solution to this problem, e.g. in the following (which employs a trick on the latitude limit, specifying an image point on the other side of the planet, with the pole in between).
par(mar = c(1.5, 1.5, 0.5, 0.5))
mapPlot(coastlineWorld,
longitudelim = c(-180, 180), latitudelim = c(60, 90),
projection = "+proj=stere +lat_0=90 +lat_ts=90", col = "gray"
)
Here, the region of interest is defined with
longitudelim
and latitudelim
, instead of with
clongitude
, clatitude
and span
.
Note that the latitude limit is set to extend past the pole, which is a
way of making the plot include the pole. See the table in the
documentation for mapPlot
for a listing of arguments, and
for citations to external resources that explain what they mean.
Exercise 3. Draw a view of Antarctica and the Southern Ocean.
The Lambert Conformal view is often used in maps that span wide longitudinal ranges, e.g. a map of Canada may be produced as follows.
par(mar = c(1.5, 1.5, 0.5, 0.5))
mapPlot(coastlineWorld,
longitudelim = c(-130, -55), latitudelim = c(45, 70),
projection = "+proj=lcc +lat_1=50 +lat_2=65 +lon_0=-100", col = "gray"
)
Here, lat_1
and lat_2
, the latitudes where
the projection cone intersects the earth, are set to span southern
Canada and northern USA, and lon_0
, the meridian that will
be vertical on the plot, is chosen to lie near the middle of the
continent.
Exercise 4. Plot the eastern North Atlantic using the Universal Transverse Mercator projection.
Exercise 5. Plot the eastern North Atlantic using the Albers Equal-Area Conic projection.
Several functions are provided by oce to draw additional features on
maps. These include mapText
for adding text,
mapPoints
for adding points, mapLines
for
adding lines, mapContour
for adding contours, and
mapImage
for adding images. Each of these requires a map to
have been drawn first with mapPlot
. The interfaces ought to
be similar enough to base-R functions that readers can decide how to
accomplish common tasks.
Exercise 6. Plot the world with the Goode projection, superimposing sea surface temperature as contours.
Exercise 1. Plot the world with a Robinson projection, using gray shading for land.
Exercise 2. Plot an image of world topography with the Mollweide projection.
Note that some adjustment of the margins is required to fit the colorbar.
par(mar = c(1.5, 1, 1.5, 1))
data(topoWorld)
topo <- decimate(topoWorld, 2) # coarsen grid: 4X faster plot
lon <- topo[["longitude"]]
lat <- topo[["latitude"]]
z <- topo[["z"]]
cm <- colormap(name = "gmt_globe")
drawPalette(colormap = cm)
mapPlot(coastlineWorld, projection = "+proj=moll", grid = FALSE, col = "lightgray")
mapImage(lon, lat, z, colormap = cm)
Exercise 3. Draw a view of Antarctica and the Southern Ocean.
par(mar = c(1.5, 1.5, 0.5, 0.5))
mapPlot(coastlineWorld,
longitudelim = c(-180, 180), latitudelim = c(-130, -50),
projection = "+proj=stere +lat_0=-90", col = "gray", grid = 15
)
Exercise 4. Plot the eastern North Atlantic using the Universal Transverse Mercator projection.
Zone 20 includes Nova Scotia, which is also a good place to centre the view.
par(mar = c(1.5, 1.5, 0.5, 0.5))
mapPlot(coastlineWorld,
col = "lightgray",
projection = "+proj=utm +zone=20",
longitudelim = c(-85, -45), latitudelim = c(40, 60)
)
Exercise 5. Plot the eastern North Atlantic using an Albers Equal-Area Conic projection.
In the solution given below, note how the lon_0
argument
is set to be at the central value of longitudelim
. This
makes the \(60^\circ\)W line be
vertical on the plot. The settings for lat_1
and
lat_2
are the locations at which the cone intersects the
earth, so distortion is minimized at those latitudes. Note how the lines
of constant longitude are changed, compared with those in the Mercator
view. It may be informative to compare the relative ratio of the area of
Nova Scotia (at \(45^\circ\)N) and
Ungava Bay (at \(60^\circ\)N) in this
Albers Equal-Area projection, and the Mercator projection shown in the
previous diagram.
par(mar = c(1.5, 1.5, 0.5, 0.5))
mapPlot(coastlineWorld,
col = "lightgray",
projection = "+proj=aea +lat_1=45 +lat_2=55 +lon_0=-65",
longitudelim = c(-85, -45), latitudelim = c(40, 60)
)
Exercise 6. Plot the world with the Goode projection, superimposing sea surface temperature as contours.
Note that the temperature is provided by the ocedata
package.
par(mar = rep(0.5, 4))
mapPlot(coastlineWorld, projection = "+proj=goode", col = "lightgray")
if (requireNamespace("ocedata", quietly = TRUE)) {
data(levitus, package = "ocedata")
mapContour(levitus[["longitude"]], levitus[["latitude"]], levitus[["SST"]])
}
PROJ contributors. “PROJ Coordinate Transformation Software Library.”
Open Source Geospatial Foundation, 2020.
https://proj.org/
Snyder, John P. “Map Projections-a Working Manual.” Washington: U.S. Geological survey professional paper 1395, 1987.
Snyder, John Parr. “Flattening the Earth: Two Thousand Years of Map
Projections.” Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, 1993.
https://press.uchicago.edu/ucp/books/book/chicago/F/bo3632853.html
Snyder, John P., and Philip M. Voxland. “An Album of Map
Projections.” U. S. Geological Survey Professional Paper. Washington,
DC, USA: U. S. Department of the Interior: U. S. Geological Survey,
1994. https://pubs.er.usgs.gov/publication/pp1453